Judgment
What it decides, and what it refuses.
A case is put against every candidate before capital moves, and what it decides is ranked against everything else it could be doing instead.
AI Agentic Trading
AI automated agentic trading desk for macOS, iOS, Android and Windows. 17+ trading strategies simultaneously scan and compete for one pool of capital, under pre-trade risk checks and protective orders you set. The program scans, decides, enters, exits, judges and adjusts, completely automated and intelligently.
Autonomous trading involves substantial risk of loss, including loss of all capital connected and, in margin accounts, more. TradeAgentic is software you license and run; RLG, LLC does not manage accounts or give personalized advice. Read the risk disclosures before licensing.
Judgment
Clearing the entry rules is not permission to trade. It is permission to be argued with. Every surviving candidate has a case built against it from evidence the desk already holds, and only those that survive it are funded.
Every refusal is recorded and scored later against what the market actually did, so the cost of saying no is a measured quantity rather than an article of faith.
Every refusal is carried through the same lifecycle as a funded trade, so what it saved or cost becomes a measured quantity rather than a claim. That record is reported, and the desk answers to it: refusing is held to the same standard of evidence as acting.
There is no approval queue, no discretionary override and no setting that lets an operator wave a trade past the chain. You set the account and the risk limits. It runs the desk, whether you are watching or asleep.
Illustrative and simplified. Not a live feed, not the decision path itself, and not a recommendation regarding any security shown.
Intelligence
Almost no trading system can tell you whether it is getting better, because nothing in it is keeping score of itself. This one carries a standing measure of its own competence, and it keeps the history so that change is something you can see rather than something you argue about.
It is assembled from measures of the desk’s own record, computed from the same history it trades on, and that history is kept so that improvement is something you can see rather than something you argue about.
Every part of it is computed from the desk’s own recorded outcomes. Nothing in it is a matter of opinion, nothing responds to how the last few days felt, and nothing moves the measure except outcomes that have actually been recorded.
Shown in outline. How the measure is built is provided to licensees.
The agent loop
A desk that thinks for itself is a claim, so here is what it means. The software forms its own view on every candidate, tests that view against the evidence it already holds before any capital moves, and afterwards finds out what the market actually did about the decision. No discretionary override and no trade that bypasses the checks. Every decision is recorded as it happens, whichever way it went.
Grading its own decisions is the part most systems never attempt, which is why most of them cannot tell you whether they are getting better. Almost every self improving system learns only from what it took. This one also learns from what it declined, which is the great majority of what a disciplined desk does.
Execution
Expected edge is a claim. What the account is left with after costs is the result. The desk answers to the result.
Stated as a principle. How it is enforced is provided to licensees.
How it works
They divide into what the desk decides, what it remembers, and what it changes about itself. Each is scored by the machinery it supervises, and each earns its authority from its own record.
What it decides, and what it refuses.
A case is put against every candidate before capital moves, and what it decides is ranked against everything else it could be doing instead.
What it keeps, so that it can learn at all.
Every yes and every no it has ever made, kept and later scored against what the market actually did. Exits are scored as carefully as entries.
What it changes about itself, and on what evidence.
Capital moves toward what its own record says is working. It re-examines its own record continuously, and reports what it finds.
Bedrock
Under every autonomy mode, including full automatic. Only you can change these, and every change is recorded. The desk may tune some operating parameters within fixed ranges documented for licensees; it may not loosen anything below.
The charter
A change that adds expected profit while weakening a loss bound fails this charter.
Governing document. Every audit the machine performs on itself is tested against it.
Every judgment the system makes, whether a control change, a veto, an audit finding or a line of code it proposes, has to justify itself: what it is for, what graded evidence supports it, how it will be measured afterwards, and what bounds the damage if it turns out to be wrong. Anything that cannot answer for itself on those terms is an observation, not an action.
The honesty requirements are enforced structurally rather than aspirationally. Claims are graded against outcomes rather than accepted on their reasoning. Changes carry receipts: what changed, why, the value that was persisted, and the metric that will later prove or disprove it. Every part of the system is held to the standard it applies to others.
Perception
So the desk draws on sources that are not, and on shapes a chart cannot show you. Public disclosure, the state of the order book, and the changing geometry of the market as a whole. Every feed is best effort by design: a dead feed gates nothing, and the engine keeps flying.
Abbreviated. The full perception stack, and how each source is weighted and validated, are documented for licensees.
The application
A native Mac app, resident in the menu bar, watching an engine that runs as its own supervised process. Both run on your machine and talk to each other locally. The engine reaches out to your broker and its data sources. By default nothing accepts inbound connections; the optional signal webhook, if you turn it on, opens an authenticated inbound endpoint.
Broker keys and risk limits. The keys go into the macOS Keychain, are never written to a file by the software and are never sent to RLG. After that the engine runs its pre flight and starts. On the next launch it resumes in whatever mode it last ran, and after a reboot the login item brings it back without anyone pressing anything.
Every row in the ledger is inspectable: what the desk saw, what it decided, and, days later, what the market did about that decision. The dashboard carries live market context derived from the same data the engine trades on, so the screen can never disagree with the trading logic.
The learning feed records every adjustment the desk makes to itself, with the evidence that caused it. Every one of them evidenced, timestamped and readable afterwards. It is the difference between a system that claims to adapt and one that shows you the receipt.
Alerts from charting platforms, or anything that can post JSON, enter as ideas and never as orders. They clear every check anything built in has to clear, and they are treated as one more strategy with no head start, set aside if they do not pay. An alert carrying a quantity is refused outright, because sizing is never the sender’s job.
The suite that guards all of this includes a check which drives a live regulatory filing all the way to a protected order at the broker, with no human step anywhere in the path.
Licensing
Sold to operators and firms who intend to run it, not to redistribute it. Every tier includes the charter, the owner’s guide and the reproducible research, because a system you cannot audit is one you should not run.
Before you ask for terms: the desk places trades in your account without asking you first. It will be wrong regularly. Losses are bounded by limits you set and by protective orders at your broker, not eliminated, and stop orders do not guarantee a price. Connect only capital you can afford to lose, and start in paper mode.
One operator, one machine, one account
Scoped to your seats, accounts and mandates
Perpetual, with build rights and governance
Inquiries
Account size, the asset classes you care about, and whether you intend to operate it or build on it. Terms follow from that.
The detail behind all of this is withheld for the same reason the desk refuses most of its own signals: the value is in the calibration, and calibration given away is calibration destroyed. Licensees receive it in full.
Answered by an engineer, not a queue
Questions
Saved in this browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere. Accessibility statement
Background
The category explained, what to require of it, how to judge one against another, and what it looks like for your kind of operation.